De los Santos-Reyes vs. In her complaint filed on 23 MarchGuillerma de los Santos-Reyes charges the respondent judge with gross ignorance of law and evident dishonesty in the performance of his work in that he granted bail to the accused in Criminal Cases Nos.
Posted by kaye lee on Invoking his powers as Commander-in-Chief under Sec 18, Art.
WoN the President's factual determination of the necessity of calling the armed forces is subject to judicial review. WoN the calling of AFP to assist the PNP in joint visibility patrols violate the constitutional provisions on civilian supremacy over the military.
The judicial power shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such lower courts as may be established by law. Judicial power includes the duty of the courts of justice to settle actual controversies involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable, and to determine whether or not there has been grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of any branch or instrumentality of the Government.
Oct 12, · G.R. No. Estrada vs. Arroyo G.R. No Estrada vs. Desierto March 2, FACTS: Estrada was inaugurated as president of the Republic of the Philippines on June 30, with Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo as his Vice President. In the same case of Soliven, et al., vs Judge Makasiar () petitioners argued that “the reasons which necessitate presidential immunity from suit impose a correlative disability to file suit”. Apr 17, · For lack of necessary votes, the second motion for reconsideration of petitioner Tolentino dated May 11, and the supplement thereto dated May 15, , including the prayer that the vote of Justice Barredo be declared null and void, are deemed grupobittia.com: Alchemybizcenter Katipunan.
When questions of constitutional significance are raised, the Court can exercise its power of judicial review only if the following requisites are complied with, namely: The deployment of the Marines does not constitute a breach of the civilian supremacy clause.
The calling of the Marines in this case constitutes permissible use of military assets for civilian law enforcement. The participation of the Marines in the conduct of joint visibility patrols is appropriately circumscribed.
It is their responsibility to direct and manage the deployment of the Marines. It is, likewise, their duty to provide the necessary equipment to the Marines and render logistical support to these soldiers.
In view of the foregoing, it cannot be properly argued that military authority is supreme over civilian authority. Moreover, the deployment of the Marines to assist the PNP does not unmake the civilian character of the police force.Soliven vs Makasiar, In satisfying himself of the existence of probable cause, the Judge is not required to personally examine the complainant and his witnesses.
no. , february 22, - central mindanao university, represented by its president, dr. maria luisa r. soliven, petitioner, v. republic of the philippines. Sep 10, · / Makasiar David invested several deposits with the Nation Savings and Loan Association [NSLA].
He said that he was induced into making said investments by an Australian national who was a close associate of the petitioners [NSLA officials]. Mar 11, · Commissioner vs Makasiar GR 29 August 11 Wednesday Mar Posted by Rachel Chan in Case Digests, Constitutional Law II ≈ Leave a comment.
Apr 23, · This is a petition for certiorari, to review the decision of respondent Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. No. R, entitled "Mercedes T. Sonora, et al.
versus Francisco A. Tongoy, et al.", promulgated on December 3, Author: Alchemybizcenter Katipunan. Oct 24, · pinoy case digest, digested cases, case digest, case digests, philippine digested cases, digest case pinoy.